2025 financial accounts

It appears that there are 2 types of owners, good & bad. We have seen time and time again a number of “bad” owners from Yongge to the Glazers and have seen what happens to the fortunes of those clubs when they have been poorly run.

However, the owners that don’t make headlines and go un-noticed are normally the better ones. As you mentioned, Brentford, Brighton have a large amount of debt against them as they have built new stadiums which isn’t cheap! Bournemouth have done it slightly differently and have stayed within their means and built up slowly.

I guess only time will tell whats going to happen. We will always have that “What if?” question hanging over our heads but I haven’t seen or heard anything that’ll make us worried.

I took some time mull this over without comment, as to not say anything reactionary.

At first glance, these figures are really alarming, for a club of our size. It’s also really no consolation to me that almost every other club is also losing money hand over first.

The important questions ahead are:

  1. Will the losses continue at such a high level?
  2. What happens when Lomtadze wants to move on?

On the first question, I think it’s reasonable to expect the last financial year to account for the largest L1 losses of ML’s ownership.

We’ve made significant up-front investments into the academy, the training ground, the golf club, and the backroom staff (including compensation for Dodds and co.). We have assets to show for the spend.

Seeing any profit from the academy in terms of player sales is a long term project, but the costs almost entirely came to bear this season.

If we get to the Championship, income would increase massively, but the academy investment should drop without the need for such significant one-off payments.

We appear to have been quite wasteful on transfers fees and player salaries this season, but hopefully mistakes have been learned from and recruitment will become more savvy.

I still suspect we will lose money most seasons, but as a much smaller percentage of turnover.

  1. ML seems like a very private person. One of the quickest ways to lose your privacy in England is to become a target of the media, especially around football.

If Wycombe become the next Bury / Reading / Derby County, his name will be associated with a very ugly financial situation.

He also doesn’t have a track record of shafting clubs, unlike Yongge and Dale, so its far more reasonable to give him the benefit of the doubt.

To ML’s credit, he’s put his money where his mouth is in terms of investing in the club, and the academy. The money hasn’t always appeared to be spent wisely, or in a way that has resulted in immediate success. However, you can’t blame Lomtadze for that, he is delegating almost all responsibility to others, including but not limited to Rice, players and manager.

And his vision has always been long term, rather than spaffing cash on a huge squad of stars. I’d rather an owner tries to implement a long term vision that involves developing talent over many years, than immediate success.

Who comes after Lomtadze, and what happens to the debt and running costs, who knows? Given his long term goals, I think its too far away to have any certainty on any of it.

4 Likes

Has the Frank Adams roof been fixed now?

4 Likes

Here are some account details of operating losses before player trading for clubs the season they gained promotion to the Premier League for the first time.

Brentford - £56 Million loss in 20/21.

Brighton - £36 Million loss in 16/17.

Bournemouth - £39 Million Loss in 14/15

1 Like

Yeah but because they fluked it and got promoted they’re all ‘so well run’. In a counter factual scenario they’d all have gone bust.

3 Likes

Dunno. It hasn’t rained my couple of visits to AP so can’t tell!!

1 Like

Whilst the stadium is owned by the Trust it was leased to the club on a full repairing basis, so it is on the club to fix this…perhaps the Trust need to push the matter with the club.

3 Likes

I thought the same thing. I’d like to know how we turned a profit on players, it’s seems very unlikely.

They were signed in a different accounting period. The accounts published this week are up to 30 June 2005. The contracts for Mikki van Sas, Taylor Allen and Bradley Fink will have started on 1st July 2025 and will therefore be included in the next set of accounts.

That also applies to the pitch, which was renovated at a cost of c. £1m last summer.

1 Like

The cost of running a category 1 academy is said be c. £1m per season.

I’m not sure administration / liquidation for WWFC is likely to become a particularly big / significant media news story.

Mikhail Lomtadze’s investment in WWFC is through loans, which until converted into equity, really isn’t what I would call an “investment.”

Reaching the Championship ought to be the number one priority as it would significantly reduce the level of funding needed from Lomtadze. Whether it would bring us anywhere close to becoming self-sustainable is moot.

2 Likes

I thought it only rained on @micra!

1 Like

In that case we can switch Van Sas, Allen and Fink for Magnus, Anders and Norris (etc). Where does our player income come from in this period?

Am I missing what you are seeing? We spent just over £2m on transfer fees in the period. Not sure where you are seeing receipts of over that value.

1 Like

I’ve been having some fun seeing what Copilot thinks of the accounts in relation to the powers and responsibilities of the Independent Football Regulator.

The accounts explicitly state:

“Integral to this assessment is the continued support of the ultimate owner.”

This is a red flag under IFR rules.

I imagine its also the main worry of us punters. But in theory the IFR will have the powers to actually do something about it!

I’d expect the club to be planning for the new landscape. The question is how are they planning to survive and compete under this new regulatory regime??!

1 Like

I’m looking at ‘net player sales profit 325K.’

I don’t believe that can mean the net of incoming and outgoing transfer fees because the numbers don’t add up.

Are you looking at the actual accounts filed at Companies House or the COTN twitter post at the top of this thread. Not saying he is wrong but can’t see the figure in the posted accounts. Do you have a link to accounts showing this figure.
Filed Accounts do show player purchases of over £2m but can’t think of sales of either current players or sell-ons of previous players that would come close to this figure.

To be fair it all looks in better shape than my household finances…

1 Like

Article here for anyone looking for an in-depth explanation of the financial statements: Wycombe Wanderers have released their financial statements – what do they mean? - The Quartermen