Right.
Based on the quoted figure and the player departures in the accounting period, it can only be the compensation fee received from Huddersfield Town for Joe Low (as he was under 24).
The Chairnabeu
You think Joe Low was âsoldâ for ÂŁ2.5m?
Anyway his transfer completed in the 25/26 year - 1 July.
Itâs AI, which has a strange habit of generating football pitches without goal frames. Definitely a wind up
Sorry @DevC HMRC is not a preferred creditor as far as a football club is concerned wrt the definition of a football creditor as used by the EFL, so they donât get paid in full.
They are a secondary preferred creditor for VAT and PAYE, so get paid a percentage.
This is why we now see HMRC filing petitions against clubs for non-payment - they need to get in before a club is declared bankrupt in order to secure their payments.
Not sure you read accurately what I wrote @Twizz . It happens. I said as a preferential creditor would need to be paid in full before unsecured creditors get anything. That is true. It is possible of course that there may not be enough cash to pay even them.
I donât think that is the case - only football creditors need to be paid in full as per the EFL rules.
HMRC donât need to be paid in full - they may be but in no means is it necessary for any new owner.
That said âfootball creditorsâ is going to be an alarming sum of money if (when?) it all goes tits up.
Exceptional work sir
Football creditors need to be paid in full if the club is to survive.
Any remaining money pays the preferential creditors including HMRC
Other creditors only get cash if preferential creditors are paid in full.
Email from the Trust this morning:
We fully understand the level of genuine concern amongst the clubâs fanbase following the recent publication of the June 2025 audited accounts.
The Supporters Trust Board is collating questions from fans which will be put to the Ownership Group and fed back to members. Please email any questions you may have to wwst@wwst.org.uk by 19 March.
Independent Football Regulator
A new licensing system for the 116 clubs in the EPL, EFL and NL will require them to hold âsufficient resourcesâ to steer them away from any potential âcliff edgeâ. Level of risk will be assessed on a club-by-club basis by Independent Football Regulator. In order to compete, clubs in the top five divisions will require a provisional licence from 2026/27 season. From 2027/28 season, they will require a full licence from the IFR.
Clubs need to show liquidity to meet their financial commitments and cope with âstressâ such as relegation or withdrawal of owner funding. Club liquidity will be monitored on an ongoing basis by the IFR which can also impose measures such as âreducing expenditure or restructuring debtâ. (Players not counted as liquid assets as âclubs cannot readily realise their value outside transfer windowsâ). Clubs must also show evidence of âhaving meaningfully consulted" with fans.
âIt cannot be right that so many clubs exist on a cliff edge where one change could threaten their entire existence â fans should be debating formations not finances,â says IFR CEO Richard Monks. âOur licensing regime will ensure that club risk is managed appropriately, creating a more stable environment for growth and investment.â
Four âkey risk factorsâ that IFR expects clubs to âmonitor and mitigateâ areâŚ
*Business Model â funding gaps between income and costs.
*Liquidity & Cash flow â the ability to meet short-term financial obligations.
*Solvency and Debt â risks to operating in the medium to long term.
*Governance â adequacy of financial decision-making and risk management.
Thanks
Jon, Ben, Dan, Nigel, Alan, Trevor and Tony
Your WWST Board
Last day today to get your questions on the accounts in by email to wwst@wwst.org.uk
That will give us time to raise them with the FD and ownership group in the hope of having answers by the WWST monthly members meeting on 26th March
Todayâs update: Steve Dale appears in court after being charged with fraud
Anyone know if thereâs a chance he gets a prison sentence? ![]()